Add CHANGES.md and NEWS.md entries for CVE-2023-6237
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/23243)
This commit is contained in:
parent
e09fc1d746
commit
38b2508f63
23
CHANGES.md
23
CHANGES.md
@ -81,6 +81,28 @@ OpenSSL 3.2
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Changes between 3.2.0 and 3.2.1 [xx XXX xxxx]
|
### Changes between 3.2.0 and 3.2.1 [xx XXX xxxx]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys,
|
||||||
|
a computation is done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite.
|
||||||
|
For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more large primes and this
|
||||||
|
computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime,
|
||||||
|
then this computation would take a long time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA key
|
||||||
|
obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service
|
||||||
|
attack.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL
|
||||||
|
functions however it is called from the OpenSSL pkey command line
|
||||||
|
application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used
|
||||||
|
with the "-pubin" and "-check" options on untrusted data.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To resolve this issue RSA keys larger than OPENSSL_RSA_MAX_MODULUS_BITS will
|
||||||
|
now fail the check immediately with an RSA_R_MODULUS_TOO_LARGE error reason.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
([CVE-2023-6237])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*Tomáš Mráz*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Restore the encoding of SM2 PrivateKeyInfo and SubjectPublicKeyInfo to
|
* Restore the encoding of SM2 PrivateKeyInfo and SubjectPublicKeyInfo to
|
||||||
have the contained AlgorithmIdentifier.algorithm set to id-ecPublicKey
|
have the contained AlgorithmIdentifier.algorithm set to id-ecPublicKey
|
||||||
rather than SM2.
|
rather than SM2.
|
||||||
@ -20412,6 +20434,7 @@ ndif
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
<!-- Links -->
|
<!-- Links -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[CVE-2023-6237]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-6237
|
||||||
[CVE-2023-6129]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-6129
|
[CVE-2023-6129]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-6129
|
||||||
[CVE-2023-5678]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5678
|
[CVE-2023-5678]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5678
|
||||||
[CVE-2023-5363]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5363
|
[CVE-2023-5363]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5363
|
||||||
|
6
NEWS.md
6
NEWS.md
@ -31,7 +31,10 @@ OpenSSL 3.2
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.2.0 and OpenSSL 3.2.1 [under development]
|
### Major changes between OpenSSL 3.2.0 and OpenSSL 3.2.1 [under development]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Fix POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupting vector registers on PowerPC
|
* Fixed Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys
|
||||||
|
([CVE-2023-6237])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Fixed POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupting vector registers on PowerPC
|
||||||
CPUs which support PowerISA 2.07
|
CPUs which support PowerISA 2.07
|
||||||
([CVE-2023-6129])
|
([CVE-2023-6129])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -1582,6 +1585,7 @@ OpenSSL 0.9.x
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
<!-- Links -->
|
<!-- Links -->
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[CVE-2023-6237]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-6237
|
||||||
[CVE-2023-6129]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-6129
|
[CVE-2023-6129]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-6129
|
||||||
[CVE-2023-5678]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5678
|
[CVE-2023-5678]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5678
|
||||||
[CVE-2023-5363]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5363
|
[CVE-2023-5363]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5363
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user